Quantcast
Channel: UVM Forums RSS Feed
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 756

UVMconnect: no field named m_get_if_mask

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I'm facing an issue when using the UVMconnect package.

 

The simulator complains about missing fields:

# ** Error: (vsim-3567) /share/uvmc-2.2//src/connect/sv/uvmc_tlm1.sv(652): No field named 'm_get_if_mask'.
#         Region: /uvmc_pkg::uvmc_tlm1_port_proxy::uvmc_tlm1_port_proxy__1
# ** Error: (vsim-3567) /share/uvmc-2.2//src/connect/sv/uvmc_tlm1.sv(652): No field named 'm_get_if_mask'.
#         Region: /uvmc_pkg::uvmc_tlm1_port_proxy::uvmc_tlm1_port_proxy__1
# ** Error: (vsim-3043) /share/uvmc-2.2//src/connect/sv/uvmc_tlm1.sv(652): Unresolved reference to 'm_get_if_mask'.
#         Region: /uvmc_pkg::uvmc_tlm1_port_proxy::uvmc_tlm1_port_proxy__1
# ** Error: (vsim-3567) /share/uvmc-2.2//src/connect/sv/uvmc_tlm2.sv(412): No field named 'm_get_if_mask'.
#         Region: /uvmc_pkg::uvmc_tlm2_port_proxy::uvmc_tlm2_port_proxy__1
# ** Error: (vsim-3567) /share/uvmc-2.2//src/connect/sv/uvmc_tlm2.sv(412): No field named 'm_get_if_mask'.
#         Region: /uvmc_pkg::uvmc_tlm2_port_proxy::uvmc_tlm2_port_proxy__1
# ** Error: (vsim-3043) /share/uvmc-2.2//src/connect/sv/uvmc_tlm2.sv(412): Unresolved reference to 'm_get_if_mask'.
#         Region: /uvmc_pkg::uvmc_tlm2_port_proxy::uvmc_tlm2_port_proxy__1

 

I have two connections in my desing, one TLM2 socket connection and one TLM1 analysis port connection.

The SystemVerilog transaction item (my_item) has the packing methods implemented in the class, on SystemC side (my_sc_item) I use converter specialization for conversion.

 

For example for the TLM2 connection, this is the code on SV side:

 

uvm_tlm_b_initiator_socket #(my_item) initiator;

initiator = new("initiator", this);

uvmc_tlm #(my_item)::connect(initiator, "uvmc_channel");

 

And on SC side:

 

tlm_utils::passthrough_target_socket<module, 32, my_sc_item> target;

uvmc::uvmc_connect(target, "uvmc_channel");

 

 

I used UVMconnect successfully before, thus I wonder what's wrong in this case.

Any idea where those errors comes from?

 

Thanks,

Thomas

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 756

Trending Articles